A few weeks after a historic U-turn by the Supreme Court on the right to abortion, the House of Representatives voted on Tuesday, July 19, on a law to protect same-sex marriage, for fear of a reversal of the highest court. of the country in this regard.
Legislative power versus judicial power? Fearing a new reversal of the Supreme Court on the matter, such as on the voluntary termination of pregnancy, the House of Representatives of the United States voted on Tuesday, July 19 a law that tries to safeguard same-sex marriage in the whole of the country.
The bill, introduced only the day before in Congress, received the support of 267 elected officials, i.e. all the Democrats supported by 47 Republicans, during a vote greeted by applause in the hemicycle. 157 Republicans opposed it. However, his chances of succeeding in the Senate seem more limited since ten elected Republicans would have to vote with the Democrats. Only Senator Susan Collins has so far said she is ready to do so.
Its inclusion on the agenda, therefore, seems to have the objective of forcing the Republicans to take a position on this subject which divides their electorate.
Read also: What is the right to abortion in the United States?
A large majority of Americans indeed support same-sex marriage (71%), including in the Republican ranks. But the religious right remains mostly opposed to it. Whatever their position on the “Respect for Marriage Act”, the Republicans, therefore, risk finding themselves at odds with some of their voters before the mid-term ballot in November.
Progressives multiply bills
In concrete terms, the law repeals previous legislation defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman and prohibits civil registrars, regardless of the state in which they work, from discriminating against couples “ on the basis of their sex. , race, ethnicity or origin “. It, therefore, applies to people of the same sex, whose unions have been guaranteed since 2015 by the Supreme Court of the United States, but also to interracial couples, whom the high court has protected since 1967.
Read also: United States: the law to abortion could one day disappear?
But the High Court has just made a historic U-turn on the right to abortion, by annulling, on June 24, Roe v. Wade which guaranteed 1973 the right of American women to have an abortion in the name of ” respect for private life “.
In an argument accompanying this decision, the conservative judge Clarence Thomas considered that the right to same-sex marriage or contraception, also based on respect for private life, should, in turn, be revised.
Since then, progressive elected members of Congress have multiplied bills. “ We cannot sit idly by while the hard-won gains of the equality movement are systematically swept away,” said elected Democrat Jerry Nadler. Two texts to protect access to abortion were therefore adopted last week in the Chamber and another on the right to contraception must be voted on there this week. It is also likely that they all stumble in the Senate.
